This is the channel for the discussion of metaphysical and parapsychological subjects. Please keep discussion of these topics to this channel and out of the rest of the server.
Human beings tend to identify as the voice in our heads, or at least as the creator of those thoughts. But what we really are is that which is conscious of the thoughts (and every other aspect of our experience)(edited)
6:37 AM
The recognition that our body/mind organism is just one aspect of the human being, the other being consciousness, can be extremely valuable in dismantling the unhappy voice in our head that keeps saying "I'm not good enough, I hate you, life should be different"
6:38 AM
It's really about a shift in perspective
6:39 AM
From "I need A, B and C in order to be a good person/complete/happy" to "oh right, this is all there is, and it couldn't be different, I can relax"
6:41 AM
Happiness for the human being is available once it becomes clear that happiness cannot be found in sustained pleasure, but instead is simply the absence of guilt, blame, pride, worry and expectation. Peace of mind
sure, but they had pretty clear causes in my anxieties/what I was thinking about
3:54 PM
with my old hamster, I had a dream that he was going to die, and I woke up and he was dead
3:54 PM
but he was super old and sick and I knew he was going to die any day, and the last thing before bed I would do is check up on him, so I wasn't super amazed that I'd dreamt he'd died the night he died
Not a premonition dream, but there was an extremely strange occurrence in a dream where I saw a TV that displayed the text "Wake up, you're dreaming." This was not a lucid dream. It was as if some part of myself knew I was dreaming, but my conscious self didn't.(edited)
Human beings tend to identify as the voice in our heads, or at least as the creator of those thoughts. But what we really are is that which is conscious of the thoughts (and every other aspect of our experience)
Then why would we need to exist at all in order just to experience it? It's unnecessary.
Unless... while we're not the originators of thoughts, we assign weight to/label them, and that determines how the brain categorizes information and what future thoughts arise and so thus influences future thoughts that arise?
the self is whatever you make it. humans are not smart enough to be able to understand the world as it is, so instead we make abstractions to represent the world in a more simplified way. the self is simply one of those abstractions. most people probably think of their self as their body/brain, us tulpamancers have reduced the self to "the part of the brain that thinks that it is me", and others still say that because the brain is just a machine that gains input from its senses and from itself, there is no actual choice or free will, and therefore there is no self. all of these are equally wrong, because when dealing with symbols, nothing is real. don't ask "what is real", instead ask "what is most useful to believe"
You believe in a higher power, right? Because then it's moot. I am saying why would humans or any creatures evolve the massive complexity of being self-aware if that awareness doesn't DO anything?
It makes absolutely no sense. It's such an insanely complex thing that I don't see any way it would have arisen to the point it's at with humans without providing some sort of advantage. Which means it DOES something.(edited)
No, not so much. Because there's tons and tons of startdust that settled elsewhere and didn't produce living organisms, that's just the law of truly large numbers.
No, not so much. Because there's tons and tons of startdust that settled elsewhere and didn't produce living organisms, that's just the law of truly large numbers.
There is no such thing as purpose.
Exactly! You asked me "why would we need to exist at all if the only purpose is to experience it?" and I'm saying "because that's what stardust does (over here)"(edited)
3:47 AM
Consciousness, having an experience, that's what the universe "evolved" towards, first in the form of stars, then planets, then single-celled organisms, then us
3:48 AM
It's only a "purpose" in the sense that it was inevitable
Consciousness is far too advanced a thing to have arrived randomly it seems, though I'm willing to listen to an argument why you think it's not complex.
Generally most things that take EFFORT to develop provide an advantage of some sort. All that computational power is not cheap, it comes at an exorbitantly larger caloric requirement than most other animals brains. So you're not going to develop something that is both extraordinarily difficult to evolve AND comes with competitive disadvantages, unless it is providing an ADVANTAGE of some kind or other.
And if it provides and advantage, it isn't passive. It DOES something, it servers a purpose a purpose that means that possessing it confers some reproductive or survival advantage.
Like I said, I agree: Consciousness and our ability to survive (in other words, to "be alive") are interdependent. You can't have one without the other
Free will is a poor concept because ultimately everything is deterministic IF you could map it down to the smallest level, but that doesn't mean that our thinking isn't active, isn't doing something, isn't making choices. It's just if you knew all the infinitesimal inputs you might be able to predict outcomes. But that's irrelevant. Because the illusion of free will also impacts those outcomes.
3:54 AM
I don't know why I still join this conversation, I hate it so much. Breeloo was basically right, so if you agree with him, we're on the same page.
I just find the entire way that it's stated much of the time here to be incredibly obnoxious, lol.
Don't worry :p I only really present the framework anymore when there are new people who haven't heard me spout it yet(edited)
3:55 AM
In this case Vin
3:56 AM
that doesn't mean that our thinking isn't active, isn't doing something, isn't making choices
The thinking is just one aspect of the experience. It's just one type of dysfunctional thinking that turns out to be a) at the cause of our unhappiness and b) "optional"
3:58 AM
A lot of thoughts are "harmless" in that they aren't centered around our worth and that of everyone we know, or on our dependence on the future to look a certain way
3:58 AM
"I'm gonna make pizza tonight, so I should buy flour and veggies" = functional thought
3:59 AM
Getting to the supermarket, finding all the flour sold out, and thinking "my night is ruined" = dysfunctional thought
3:59 AM
Well, sometimes it can just be painful emotion in the moment
4:00 AM
It really becomes "unhappiness" when we still think about it two or three hours later, as in "I'm such a dumbass, I should have gone to the supermarket earlier, I can't even feed myself"
4:00 AM
That's the unhappiness that we can be free of
4:00 AM
When the pain of finding no flour at the supermarket doesn't penetrate to our "sense of self", our comfortableness with life
Let me try one more different way of wording it When we're "unhappy" (attitudinally, not emotionally), it's because of a type of thoughts whose commonality is that they are a) unnecessary for our survival and b) feel uncomfortable
4:12 AM
That our unhappiness is never the result of circumstance
4:13 AM
If you disagree, then it's more than just semantics
4:13 AM
'Cause that is really the main point I'm trying to sell, that unhappiness is never related to circumstance
Let's look at it from a sciencey perspective--sometimes things like fear, stress/anxiety (fight or flight) are maladaptive, especially since this is not the same type of life they were geared for, and we can and should realize that they're often not providing any benefit and allow ourselves to stop worrying for the sake of worrying.
I just find that. When I make simulations of things
11:44 PM
One of the best possible ways to optimize it, is usually to remove continual time
11:45 PM
You don't simulate at 60fps for instance. What you do instead, is you precalculate all collisions that can happen in X amount of time, and you fast forward that gap instantly.
11:45 PM
The only reason I can't remove time from simulated realities completely, is because of the entropy
Surgebinding is a magic system that embraces ten types of Surges, which are the fundamental forces of nature. A person who can utilize Stormlight to bind Surges is called a Surgebinder...
1:42 AM
Nevermind I clicked it I guess this is within some fictional universe
1:43 AM
Stormlight is typically drawn from infused gemstones by inhaling and willing it to enter the body. As long as the Surgebinder is holding his or her breath, Stormlight leaks out much more slowly. Surgebinders holding Stormlight can hold their breath for greatly increased lengths of time, with Stormlight sustaining the body in place of oxygen. There are ten Surges: Adhesion, Gravitation, Division, Abrasion, Progression, Illumination, Transformation, Transportation, Cohesion, and Tension.